http://almostluver.livejournal.com/ (
almostluver.livejournal.com) wrote in
insertmeathere2010-01-20 08:28 pm
Entry tags:
The I'd Hit It Meme
The I'D HIT IT Meme
{borrowed/inspired by:
nottome}
Let's face it. There are some pretty hot people out there. Ever pointed somebody out to your friends and say, I'd hit it?
Well now you have the chance to say it to their faces!
The rules of the game are simple:
1. Comment as your character. (One comment per character.)
2. Comment to others!!! Don't be shy!!!
3. Got a friend who's too shy? Post their character's name for them! They may or may not thank you for it.
4. IT'S FOR FUN, YOU GUYS. FUN!
{borrowed/inspired by:
Well now you have the chance to say it to their faces!
The rules of the game are simple:
1. Comment as your character. (One comment per character.)
2. Comment to others!!! Don't be shy!!!
3. Got a friend who's too shy? Post their character's name for them! They may or may not thank you for it.
4. IT'S FOR FUN, YOU GUYS. FUN!

no subject
I never claimed to have a heart of gold, but you don't honestly believe that to be necessary to care for the well-being of others? [He's genuinely curious about her reasoning now.]
no subject
Jerk with a Heart of Gold is... a phrase that would take me way too long to explain, given its roots in a very specific section of early 21st century Earth pop-culture which I'm pretty sure you're not familiar with [aka it's a trope and TV Tropes would take forever to explain] but... okay, so you're a superhero, right? You save people, build stuff that saves people, whatever, but you act like everyone in here is beneath you somehow. If you feel that way, why bother to be a superhero, and if you don't feel that way, why act like it?
no subject
So you believe saving others and caring about people must be mutually dependant on each other? Hmph. Because clearly no one could do such things for moral reasons.
no subject
What sort of morality advocates saving people but not caring about them?
no subject
In that case, what sort of morality advocates saving people only if you care about them?
no subject
I asked you first. [Oh, Wyn. So mature.]
no subject
And I answered by turning your question back on you. I understand the concept might be difficult for you to grasp, but try to keep up.
Ask yourself this I'm sure even you can manage this much: would you rather I save someone regardless of my feelings towards them or their worth, or would you rather I didn't?
no subject
Believe me, other-other-Brainy, I grasped the concept. It's just that's usually the tactic of someone who can't think of another way to answer the question.
It's really kind of hilarious just how much of a vegetable you think I am. Which just gets back to my original question: if you don't believe they're worth anything, why bother to save them? If someone more altruistic comes along, great; if no one does, nothing of value's been lost.
no subject
I'm well aware of that. But in this case I was turning it back on you in order to point out your flawed logic.
Please. I've met plant-based lifeforms with a higher IQ than humanity as a whole. Whenever did I say I didn't believe they were worth anything? Having a low opinion of others doesn't automatically invalidate their worth.